Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than vivo X70 Pro, with a overall score of 87.7 against 78.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy M51's construction is older, thicker and heavier than vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The Galaxy M51 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.