Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. The Galaxy Note 20 body is older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a screen that is very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger sensor and a camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.