Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than vivo X70 Pro, with a overall score of 98.9 against 78.3. Even being the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is older, heavier and a little thicker than the vivo X70 Pro. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's CPU is just as good as the CPU in vivo X70 Pro, both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.