Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 78.3. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still a bit lighter. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit lower pixels density and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
The vivo X70 Pro features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.