Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a bit lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but both are 0.31inches thick. Vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels density. The vivo X70 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.