Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 89 against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a little lighter. Galaxy Note10 features a screen that's very similar to vivo X70 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 and vivo X70 Pro both have quite similar memory for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.