Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy Note10 Lite have extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger display. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's battery duration is just as good as vivo X70 Pro's battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a 1 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.