Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note3's global score of 77.7. The vivo X70 Pro design is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but a little heavier than the Galaxy Note3. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, a larger display and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much bigger camera aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos.
The vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.