Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note4's 77.6 score. The vivo X70 Pro construction is incredibly newer and a bit thinner, but a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note4. The Galaxy Note4 has just a bit better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro has much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 3220mAh. The vivo X70 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much better resolution camera, higher video frame rates, a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a way larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.