Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, with a score of 79.5 against 78.3. Galaxy Note7's design has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro has a superior CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.