Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a global score of 83, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than vivo X70 Pro.
Galaxy Note8 features just a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The vivo X70 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.