Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the vivo X70 Pro, with an 88.3 score against 78.3. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. The Galaxy S10 is a lighter cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy S10 features a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a greater display density.
Galaxy S10 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.