Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a 93.6 score against 78.3. The Galaxy S10 5G is a just a bit heavier phone than the vivo X70 Pro, but both are 0.31inches thick. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a better pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a quite bigger screen. The vivo X70 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The vivo X70 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G feature similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro and the Galaxy S10 5G both count with very similar battery durations, although the Galaxy S10 5G also has a 4500mAh battery size against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.