Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Galaxy S10 Lite is a better device than vivo X70 Pro, it must be noted that it's also older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a screen that's very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen. Vivo X70 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture, a much larger camera sensor and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a battery life that's just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a 1% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.