Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 86.3 score against 78.3. Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but both are 0.31inches thick. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e features a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy S10e features a little bit more storage for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 44% more battery size. Vivo X70 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.