Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than vivo X70 Pro, with a 94.8 score against 78.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a somewhat lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but they are 0.31inches thick.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S20. Both have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy S20 counts with a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The vivo X70 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S20 has a bigger storage for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.