Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a score of 90.8 against 78.3. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide identical operating system features. Even being the best phone we compare here, it must be told that it is also older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel count in each screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE's battery performance is just as good as vivo X70 Pro's battery duration, although the Galaxy S20 FE also has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, a camera in the back with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.