Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a global score of 98 against 78.3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a better pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a bit bigger display. The vivo X70 Pro features just a little better performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor which offers a way worse image and video quality and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.