Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Phantom black and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a score of 98.1, which is way better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is better than vivo X70 Pro, we must note that it is also somewhat thicker and heavier.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.