Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. Even when Galaxy S22 and the vivo X70 Pro were released with only 5 months difference, Galaxy S22 is a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
Galaxy S22 has a little bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same back camera sensor size and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4450mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.