Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Despite being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X70 Pro. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a greater pixel count in each inch of screen. Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little longer battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.