Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a global score of 80.8 against 78.3. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S5 is much older and just a bit thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is still a lot lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S5 has newer 4.4.2 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 features a better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X70 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 9 GB more RAM. Vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S5, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Vivo X70 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.