| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Blue and Red |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X70 Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though the vivo X70 Pro is heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
The vivo X70 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, higher video frame rates, a much more megapixels camera and a much bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
Vivo X70 Pro features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 59 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.