| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S6 has a score of 87.4, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 has the older 5.0 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. Although the Galaxy S6 is much older than the vivo X70 Pro, it's construction is thinner and much lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S6 features a much more vibrant screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density. The vivo X70 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S6 has a little bit better performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit processing unit. The vivo X70 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 75 percent more battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.