| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2015-04-10 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S6 Edge is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 85.7 against 78.3. The Galaxy S6 Edge body is a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, although it was released 7 years before. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 Edge has an older 5.0 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge features just a bit better processing power than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S6 Edge features an incredibly better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel density.
The vivo X70 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X70 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.