Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Galaxy S7's construction has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos, a lot more MP back camera and faster video frame rate. The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4450mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.