Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-30 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a general score of 78.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 general score. Although vivo X70 Pro is notably newer than the Galaxy S7 edge, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 24% greater battery capacity. Vivo X70 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.