Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. The Galaxy S9 is a incredibly older and a little thicker phone than vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 counts with a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen density. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The vivo X70 Pro features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.