Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, heavier and way thicker phone than the vivo X70 Pro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a battery life that's just as good as vivo X70 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a 1% greater battery capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera, a much higher video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.