Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than vivo X70 Pro, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 78.3. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, offering some extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the vivo X70 Pro, even though it was released around 20 months before.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip's storage for games and applications is very similar to vivo X70 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage. The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs, a back facing camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
The vivo X70 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.