Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than vivo X70 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and a little lighter. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's processor is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the display and a little larger display. The vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos, a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G's memory to install applications and games is very similar to vivo X70 Pro's one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.