Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and much heavier phone than the vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung made it somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bigger display.
Galaxy Z Fold 2's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in vivo X70 Pro, they have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and vivo X70 Pro have incredibly similar memory to install applications and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature incredibly similar batteries, although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a 1% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.