Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Although Xperia XZ2 Compact is a lot older and extremely thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's body is still a little lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides some additional features and better performance.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch of screen. The vivo X70 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with more memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.