Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 construction is older, extremely thicker and somewhat heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an older 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and vivo X70 Pro count with very similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger screen. The vivo X70 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes just a bit better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 4720mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.