Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 78.3. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a screen that's very similar to the screen in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, both have equal internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.