Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's body is much newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the newer 14 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a way better 2224 x 2488 resolution, a bigger screen and a just a little greater display pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has a much faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as the vivo X70 Pro, they have equal internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures a bit better photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger sensor taking better quality photos.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little better battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.