Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older, thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4450mAh. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.