Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a score of 81.6 against 78.3. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X70 Pro. These devices come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The vivo X70 Pro and the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality images and videos, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little better battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.