Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a 78.3 score against 76.6. The vivo X70 Pro construction is newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X70 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a camera with a higher resolution, a way bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture. The vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.