Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than the vivo X70 Pro, we must note that it is also older, somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
Vivo X70 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a camera that is just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has worse video frame rate, a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with a much more MP camera.
The vivo X70 Pro features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.