Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's construction is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch of screen. Vivo X70 Pro features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit superior battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4450mAh.
The vivo X70 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos, a back-facing camera with a better resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.