Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than the vivo X70, with an 84.5 score against 73.8. The Apple iPhone XS Max construction has the same thickness than the vivo X70, but it's somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better processing unit than vivo X70, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max features a bit sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1242 x 2688px resolution and a little bit better screen pixel density. Vivo X70 shoots much better photographs and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos and a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The vivo X70 features a much better storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage. Vivo X70 features a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.