Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than the vivo X70, having an 81.6 score against 73.8. Although Google Pixel 2 is a lot older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X70, it's body is still way lighter. Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X70 features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with faster video frame rate and a much better 40 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 2 features as much storage capacity for games and applications as the vivo X70 one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 63% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.