Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than the vivo X70, with a overall score of 79.1 against 73.8. Despite of the fact that LG V30 is older than vivo X70, it's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter. Vivo X70 features just a bit better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The LG V30 features a little sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X70, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Vivo X70 counts with improved battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity. Vivo X70 features a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.