Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than vivo X70, having a overall score of 91.8 against 73.8. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. The Galaxy A71 5G is better than vivo X70, it must be told that it's also older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The vivo X70 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to vivo X70's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than vivo X70, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.