Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than vivo X70, with an 88 score against 73.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M31s design is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X70.
Galaxy M31s features a display that is just as good as the vivo X70 one, because although the Galaxy M31s has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit greater display density. The vivo X70 has just a little better performance than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M31s shoots a little bit better photos and videos than vivo X70, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a really longer battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.