Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X70's 73.8 score. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the vivo X70, we must highlight that it is also incredibly older, heavier and thicker. The vivo X70 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little more vivid screen than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher pixel number in each screen inch. Galaxy Note9 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X70 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The vivo X70 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.