Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released many years before. IPhone XS Max features a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Vivo X80 Pro features a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a lot brighter screen, a bit larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a just a bit better pixel amount per inch of display. The vivo X80 Pro features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X80 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a way higher video definition and a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.