Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. The Google Nexus 6P construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X80 Pro features a more vivid screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little higher pixels density and a larger screen. Vivo X80 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a lot better resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.