Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than vivo X80 Pro, having an 81.6 score against 72.6. The Google Pixel 2 is an older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a really bigger display, a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel density. Vivo X80 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 2, because it has a camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a larger camera aperture.
Vivo X80 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.